The man’s name is Joseph Figlock, he is said to have saved a child’s life twice in two consecutive years.
This strange story that went viral has the following content:
” In the early 1930s, in Detroit, USA, an unbelievable coincidence happened to a man named Joseph Figlock. On one occasion, Figlock was walking on the street when by chance a child fell out. Fortunately, this man caught the child, helping him to fit in the arms of his benefactor unharmed.
Everything would be nothing special if a year later, the same thing happened. The same child once again fell out of the window, and at the same time, Figlock was also passing by the same street. Once again, this man saved the child’s life.”
Another version said that in two incidents, thanks to Figlock, the child was unharmed, without a scratch on his body.
This story may seem hard to believe, but it is still spread around online forums and makes many people believe it. But what is the truth? Will Figlock really save a child’s life not once, but twice.
First, it must be clear that Figlock did not cross this road by accident. He was a street sweeper working at the Public Works Agency in Detroit. Figlock did encounter those two situations but in two different locations, of course he saved the lives of two different children.
In 1937, Figlock was cleaning an alley on John R. Street, Detroit, when a little girl fell from a fourth-floor window of a building and hit him in the head and shoulder. Both people were injured in the accident, but fortunately the child survived.
The press covered Figlock’s story.
More than a year later, in October 1938, Figlock was working in an alley near 77 E. Canfield Ave. 2-year-old boy David Thomas fell from a fourth-floor window and hit Figlock, a detail that quite coincides with an accident a year ago. The child was taken to the hospital with broken bones in several parts of his body.
Another similarity between the two events is that both children are lucky to escape the hand of Death. Many newspapers reporting on the incident also called Figlock a “child magnet”.
From all the above information, it can be said that the story that has spread widely on social networks is only half true. Someone must have modified it to become more attractive and thrilling to “sentence view” , “sentence like” . Figlock did not intentionally catch the children, but in fact they fell on him. Both babies were injured. Although there is no coincidence here, it is clear that Figlock’s presence at that important moment contributed to saving the lives of the children.