If we can say for sure two things regarding reports

If we can say for sure two things regarding reports of alleged crashed UFOs, it’s that (a) a lot of them exist and (b) many are highly controversial in nature.

Area 51 The Revealing Truth of Ufos, Secret Aircraft, Cover-Ups & Conspiracies

Now declassified CIA files of 1952 on the Spitsbergen affair begin: “Writing in the German magazine Der Fliger, Dr. Waldemar Beck says that a flying saucer which recently fell at Spitsbergen has been studied by eminent Norwegian and German rocket experts. He writes that Dr Norsal, a Norwegian expert in rocket construction, went to the place where the flying saucer had fallen a few hours after it had been discovered in the mountains of Spitsbergen by Norwegian jet planes.” The CIA continued: “In the wreck of the apparatus the expert is said to have discovered a radio piloting transmitter with a nucleus of plutonium transmitting on all wavelengths with 934 hertz, a measure that has been unknown so far. The investigation has also shown that the flying saucer crashed because of a defect in its radio piloting system.

The saucer which carried no crew has a diameter of 47 meters. The steel used in the construction is an unknown ally. It consists of an exterior disc provided at its peripheral with 46 automatic jets. This disc pivots around the central sphere which contains the measurement and remote control equipment. The measurement instructions have an inscription in Russian.” Did this report have some substance to it, and if so, was this crashed flying saucer Russian or extraterrestrial in origin? Having an interest in the case, I dug further and came across several pages of U.S. Air Force material that showed that shortly after the incident was reported by the media, the intelligence arm of the U.S. Air Force made inquiries with the Norwegian military, who asserted that they had no knowledge of the crash, but still, the story refused to die.

Three years later, a seldom seen account of the crash was printed in a Stuttgart newspaper, the Stuttgarter Tageblatt. A translation of the account read: “Oslo, Norway, Sept. 4, 1955—Only now a board of inquiry of the Norwegian General Staff is preparing publication of a report on the examination of remains of a UFO crashed near Spitsbergen, presumably in early 1952. Colonel Gernod Darnbyl, during an instruction for Air Force officers, stated: ‘The crashing of the Spitsbergen disc was highly important.

Although our present scientific knowledge does not permit us to solve all the riddles, I am confident that these remains from Spitsbergen will be of utmost importance in this respect.’” Col. Darnbyl was soon denying that the disc was Russian in origin: “Some time ago, a misunderstanding was caused by saying that this disc was of Soviet origin. It has—this we wish to state emphatically—not been built on earth. The materials used in its construction are completely unknown to all experts who participated in the investigation.” The Stuttgarter Tageblatt had still more data to impart: “According to Colonel Darnbyl, the Board of Inquiry is not going to publish an extensive report until some sensational facts have been discussed with U.S. and British experts.

We should reveal what we found out, as misplaced secrecy might lead to panic.” The newspaper continued: “Contrary to information from American and other sources, Second Lieutenants Brobs and Tyllenson, who have been assigned as special observers of the Arctic regions since the event at Spitsbergen, report the flying discs have landed in the polar regions several times. “Said Lieutenant Tyllenson: ‘I think the Arctic is serving as a kind of air base for the unknowns, especially during snow storms when we are forced back to our bases.

I have seen them land and take off on three separate occasions. I notice that, after having landed, they execute a speedy rotation around their discs. A brilliant glow of light, the intensity of which is variable with regard to speed at landing and at take off, prevents any view of the things happening behind this curtain of light and/or inside the disc itself.’”